Loading...
Publication: Troubling history and diversity: Disciplinary decadence in community psychology
Malherbe, N. Dlamini, S.
Malherbe, N.
Dlamini, S.
Citations
Altmetric:
Abstract
According to Lewis Gordon, one is said to adhere to disciplinary decadence when disciplinary orthodoxy is prioritised over how particular problems are addressed. Under neoliberal capitalism, disciplinary decadence oftentimes reproduces a politics that is based on individual – rather than collective – freedoms (i.e. a liberal politics). This article interrogates two common disciplinarily decadent ways of politicising community psychology (CP), namely: parochial historicization and respect for diversity as liberal tolerance. We argue that in both cases, pseudo-progressive language is used to advance a liberal politics that distorts the collective change-making capacities of CP. In an attempt to break from such liberal politics, we consider how an ethic of discomfort can allow community psychologists to move beyond disciplinary decadence. This ethic, we contend, can be advanced through pedagogy (i.e. unlearning disciplinary comforts) and solidarity-making (i.e. embracing, rather hurriedly resolving, conflict when forming political alliances). We conclude by calling for a CP that signifies a critical approach rather than a set of disciplinarily-bound dictums.
Description
Date
2020-08-15
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Collections
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
Keywords
Tolerance,Historiography,Justice,Diversity,Discomfort,Curriculum,Disciplinary decadence,SDG-03 Good health and well-being
Citation
Malherbe N, Dlamini S. Troubling history and diversity: Disciplinary decadence in community psychology. Community Psychology in Global Perspective, North America, 6, aug. 2020.