• Login
    View Item 
    •   SAMRC InfoSpace Home
    • Intra-Mural Research Outputs
    • Intra Mural: Journal Articles
    • View Item
    •   SAMRC InfoSpace Home
    • Intra-Mural Research Outputs
    • Intra Mural: Journal Articles
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Facial affect recognition and exit examination performance in medical students: a prospective exploratory study.

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Main article (268.2Kb)
    Date
    2014-12
    Author
    Roos, Tessa C
    Niehaus, Dana J H
    Leppänen, Jukka M
    Ras, Johan
    Cloete, Karen J
    Jordaan, Esme
    Koen, Liezl
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Background Facial affect recognition (FAR) abilities underpin emotional intelligence (EI). The latter is suggested to predict academic success and to be important for clinician-patient interaction. It is therefore of interest to investigate the possible association between FAR and academic performance in undergraduate medical students. Methods We assessed the association between the ability to recognize emotions through facial expression and exit examination performance, a measure of clinical proficiency, in undergraduate medical students stratified by gender at a South African tertiary institution using a prospective descriptive design. Data on the perception of facial expressions and exit examination marks were obtained from 144 (61%) females and 93 (39%) males with a mean age of 24.1 ± 1.6 years. Facial affect recognition measures on the Hexagon and Animation tasks were individually correlated with academic performance indicators using Pearson correlation. Results The perceptual discrimination of anger was associated with improved performance in anaesthetics (r = .24; p = .004) and urology (r = .24; p = .001), while the recognition of happiness was associated with decreased performance in obstetrics (r = −.21, p = .002). Gender was an effect modifier in the relationship between perceptual discrimination of anger and urology performance (p = .03), with a strong positive relationship for males, but a non-significant relationship for females. Conclusion There was no overall correlation between FAR and overall academic performance or with gender. However, subject (specialty) specific findings with recognition of specific emotions and with gender as effect modifier poses interesting questions about EI and FAR and prompts further research into FAR as a useful tool. Being an objective test and offering a more focused assessment makes FAR worthy of further application.
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/11288/595145
    Collections
    • Intra Mural: Journal Articles

    Browse

    All of SAMRC InfoSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2023  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    DSpace Express is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV